Watchmen (2009) - SPOILER-FREE Review
/
Directed by: Zack Snyder
Written by: David Hayter, Alex Tse
Starring: Malin Åkerman, Billy Crudup, Matthew Goode, Carla Gugino, Jackie Earle Haley, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Patrick Wilson
Runtime: 163 min
Synopsis: Set in an alternate universe circa 1985, the world is a highly unstable one where a nuclear war is imminent between America and Russia. Superheroes have long been made to hang up their tights thanks to the government-sponsored Keene Act, but that all changes with the death of a robust ex-hero commando, which perks the interest of one of the country's last remaining vigilantes, Rorschach (Jackie Earle Haley). His investigation leads him to caution many of his other former costumed colleagues, including Dr. Manhattan (Billy Crudup), Nite Owl (Patrick Wilson), Ozymandias (Matthew Goode), Sally Jupiter (Carla Gugino), and her daughter, The Silk Spectre (Malin Åkerman).
First of all, this review is based on the theatrical version of Watchmen. Usually, Director’s Cuts or Ultimate Editions are not preferred over the original release. Few films benefit from them, and most are simply an extended cut with a bunch of deleted scenes. It’s only fair and rational that a reviewer watches the version which the whole world saw at the theaters at the respective time. With that said, despite knowing the story of the source material, I never indeed read it. Having in mind that most of the “hate” that this Zack Snyder’s movie received is from comic-book purists (basically, every book/comic/game/whatever-lover who defends that any cinematic adaptations of any of these sources MUST be 100% the same, with no modifications whatsoever), I’m certain an unbiased perspective is the way to go.
And overall, this is a good feature. Watchmen isn’t just another CBM (comic-book movie). It doesn’t just follow one hero vs. one villain. It’s a whole world (in today’s standards, it’s really a cinematic universe) of “superheroes” meant to be explored in fine detail (hence the release of a TV show today… reviewing that later). It’s an extremely complex world that needs to be thoroughly explained in order to deeply understand how it works, and what’s everyone’s role in it. This is the film’s main problem: it struggles to juggle all of its different storylines and distinct characters. Even with 163min of runtime, it’s impossible to squeeze in all of the necessary information.
So, as expected, Snyder and his team of screenwriters had to simplify, shorten, or even wholly dismiss some story elements that would only stretch the runtime to an unfathomable length. Some of the adaptations work brilliantly, but some fail to give a character its importance or offer no interest to a subplot. However, it’s still easy to understand everything, and how the ending is going to unravel, which leads me to my second issue with the movie: its final act’s heavy exposition.
Like I wrote above, there is a lot of information to deliver. What Snyder did very well was to tell most of it through flashbacks or captivating conversations, but in the final act, where everything was self-explanatory and in no need of more exposition, there is an excess of redundant dialogue that doesn’t really add anything relevant. What the characters are saying is significant, yes, but we, as the audience, already know all of that way before the film’s climax. It’s ironic how they make a joke about villains telling their masterplan to the hero and how this villain isn’t dumb enough to do it, but then proceed to carefully explain everything (that we know already) through exposition.
Sincerely, these are the major problems that I have with the movie. However, I love so much about everything else. From the appropriated and fun soundtracks to the beautiful production design, Zack Snyder and his crew really do a fantastic work technically. Snyder’s style captures Watchmen’s world perfectly. It’s one of those films that carry a “feel” due to its stylish cinematography. I love how little CGI is actually applied (I’m obviously ignoring the big blue guy), and the abundance of practical effects and real sets that are used. The action sequences look spectacular, way better than a lot of blockbusters nowadays (10 years later!).
Despite the terrific technical achievements, my main compliment is actually connected to my number one problem. Even though the storylines are incredibly hard to balance, characters like Rorschach, Nite Owl, Silk Spectre, and The Comedian (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) have extraordinarily captivating and entertaining stories. There might be a few missteps here and there, but Snyder made ONE movie from a material that’s worth a whole TV show or at least two films. And he delivered a GOOD one! Probably a better job than 80% of the directors working today could ever achieve. Finally, the social commentary is still quite relevant for this new generation, and if the so-called “source-material-purists” didn’t exist, this movie would be a lot more appreciated.
Final Thoughts
All in all, Watchmen is as good as it could be, having in mind it’s just one film with already a long runtime. Its narrative was always going to be extremely difficult to tell in a solid yet compelling manner, and Zack Snyder does struggle with balancing all of the storylines and its characters. However, he and his phenomenal team still delivered a good flick. Technically sublime, with a distinct style, brilliant production design, and gorgeous cinematography. Characters like Rorschach and Nite Owl have amazing moments, filled with excellent action sequences, but also with emotionally powerful scenes. If it could be better? Maybe. If it could be split into two or three movies. As it stands, as one and only film, it’s really impressive even with its flaws.
